November 23, 2025 – China Headlines

1G20峰会联合宣言力挺《巴黎协定》,多国集体回应顶住美方施压

Story gist: The 20th G20 Leaders’ Summit opened in Johannesburg, South Africa. Leaders adopted a joint declaration supporting the Paris Agreement, with multiple countries resisting US pressure.
Left
二十国集团领导人峰会在南非约翰内斯堡开幕
— 新华网
Read Article
Center
二十国集团领导人第二十次峰会宣言获压倒性通过
— 粤学习
Read Article
Right
G20“非洲时刻”彰显全球南方力量
— 央视网
Read Article
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like Xinhua focus neutrally on the summit’s opening in Johannesburg, omitting declaration details or US pressure. Center outlets like Yuexuexi emphasize the declaration’s overwhelming passage. Right-leaning CCTV highlights the ‘Africa moment’ showcasing Global South power. Left lane downplays conflict; center stresses consensus; right amplifies emerging powers’ influence.

2特朗普:乌克兰和平计划不是最终版本

Story gist: Donald Trump stated that a U.S.-supported peace plan for Ukraine is not the final version. He indicated Ukrainian President Zelensky must agree to it.
Left
特朗普:泽连斯基必须同意美国支持的和平计划
— 新华报业网
Read Article
Center
No major center-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlet 新华报业网 frames Trump’s remarks as a demand that Zelensky ‘must agree’ to a U.S.-backed plan, emphasizing obligation and U.S. leverage. No center-leaning coverage appears, omitting neutral geopolitical context. No right-leaning coverage, absenting potential praise for Trump’s peace initiative or criticism of Zelensky.

3求是网评论员:如何理解“十五五”时期必须把因地制宜发展新质生产力摆在更加突出的战略位置?

Story gist: Qiushi Net published a commentator article on October 2024 explaining the emphasis on placing development of new quality productive forces suited to local conditions in a more prominent strategic position during China’s 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-2030).
Left
求是网评论员:如何理解“十五五”时期必须把因地制宜发展新质生产力摆在更加突出的战略位置?
— 求是网
Read Article
Center
No major center-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlet Qiushi Net framed the story as an authoritative commentary promoting and interpreting the policy directive. Center- and right-leaning outlets omitted coverage entirely, absenting neutral analysis and conservative perspectives on this internal Chinese Communist Party strategic guidance.

4搭建全球大河文明对话平台 “2025长江文化南京论坛”举行

Story gist: The 2025 Yangtze Culture Nanjing Forum was held in Nanjing, China, to establish a global platform for dialogue on great river civilizations.
Left
搭建全球大河文明对话平台 “2025长江文化南京论坛”举行
— 新华网
Read Article
Center
全球大咖齐聚南京,为江河文明互鉴“划重点”
— 新浪财经
Read Article
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning Xinhua frames the event formally as ‘building a global platform,’ using official tone without flair. Center-leaning Sina Finance employs enthusiastic language like ‘global big shots gather’ and ‘highlight key points’ for river civilization mutual learning, emphasizing vibrancy. Right-leaning outlets absent, omitting potential skeptical or domestic-priority perspectives on the international forum.

5兴业强县富民,谱写城乡融合发展新篇章——智库报告解析新时代中国县域经济高质量发展的理念与实践

Story gist: A think tank report analyzes concepts and practices of high-quality county economic development in China, focusing on strengthening industries in counties to enrich residents and advance urban-rural integration. It identifies seven counties with GDP exceeding 200 billion yuan each.
Left
兴业强县富民,谱写城乡融合发展新篇章——智库报告解析新时代中国县域经济高质量发展的理念与实践
— 新华网
Read Article
Center
7个“超强县”GDP均破2000亿元
— DoNews
Read Article
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like Xinhua use a promotional title emphasizing ideological successes in urban-rural fusion and high-quality growth. Center outlets like DoNews highlight specific data on seven ‘super strong counties’ with GDP over 200 billion yuan. Right-leaning coverage is absent, omitting any conservative or critical perspectives on the report.