December 22, 2025 – China Headlines

1陕西省气象台发布道路结冰黄色预警[Ⅲ级/较重]

Story gist: Shaanxi Provincial Meteorological Observatory issued a yellow warning for road icing, Level III (severe).
Left
No major left-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Center
陕西省气象台发布道路结冰黄色预警[Ⅲ级/较重]
— 中国气象局-天气预报
Read Article
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left- and right-leaning outlets omitted coverage entirely, leaving those perspectives absent. Center outlets reported neutrally by directly quoting the official meteorological bulletin with no added tone, emphasis, or omissions beyond the raw warning details. Lack of left/right coverage prevents comparison of partisan framing on this routine weather event.

2元旦假期海南机票预订量上涨明显;2025年成为中国影史动画电影票房最高一年|消费早参

Story gist: Hainan flight bookings rose significantly for the New Year’s Day holiday. 2025 became the highest-grossing year for animated films in Chinese film history. A Hainan Free Trade Port enclosure operation promotion was held in Milan.
Left
海南自贸港封关运行推介会在米兰举办
— 人民网国际
Read Article
Center
元旦假期海南机票预订量上涨明显;2025年成为中国影史动画电影票房最高一年|消费早参
— 每日经济新闻
Read Article
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like People’s Daily International emphasize Hainan Free Trade Port’s global promotion in Milan, with promotional tone highlighting international appeal. Center outlets like National Business Daily report neutrally on domestic consumer trends, focusing on flight booking surges and animation box office records without hype. Right-leaning coverage is absent, omitting potential skeptical views on economic data or state-led initiatives.

3坚持全国“一盘棋”

Story gist: People’s Daily reports on persisting with the nationwide ‘one chessboard’ strategy. National Development and Reform Commission states continued deep advancement of regional coordinated development.
Left
坚持全国“一盘棋”
— 人民日报
Read Article
Center
国家发改委:持续深入推进区域协调发展
— 财联社
Read Article
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning People’s Daily frames the policy with unifying slogan ‘坚持全国“一盘棋”’, emphasizing national solidarity. Center outlet Caijing focuses on technocratic NDRC announcements for ‘regional coordinated development’, highlighting implementation details. Right-leaning coverage absent, omitting potential critiques of centralization or regional disparities.

4学习手记丨为人民出政绩,以实干出政绩

Story gist: People’s Daily published ‘Study Notes’ titled ‘Achieve Performance for the People, Achieve Performance through Practical Work.’ Sina Finance featured an article by Wang Yingying titled ‘Practical Work as Sail to Reach the Shore of Achievements.’
Left
学习手记丨为人民出政绩,以实干出政绩
— politics.people.com.cn
Read Article
Center
王英英 | 实干为帆驶向业绩的彼岸
— 新浪财经
Read Article
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning People’s Daily uses prescriptive, ideological tone in official ‘study notes’ emphasizing service to people and practical governance. Center Sina Finance employs motivational metaphor of sailing to achievements via hard work, with business-oriented emphasis. Right-leaning outlets absent, providing no critical, skeptical, or alternative perspectives on political performance.

5新华社权威速览丨一起学习四大全球倡议核心要义

Story gist: Xinhua News Agency published an article titled ‘Xinhua Authoritative Quick View | Learn Together the Core Essentials of the Four Global Initiatives.’
Left
新华社权威速览丨一起学习四大全球倡议核心要义
— 新华网
Read Article
Center
No major center-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Right
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning Xinhua frames the publication as an authoritative, collective learning opportunity on China’s four global initiatives, using promotional language like ‘together learn’ to emphasize unity and importance. No center- or right-leaning outlets covered the story, omitting neutral explanations, skeptical assessments of the initiatives’ global impact, or critiques of their geopolitical aims.