1Senate agrees bill to release Epstein files after near-unanimous House vote
Story gist: The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill to release Jeffrey Epstein’s files with near-unanimous support on an unspecified recent date. The Senate agreed to the bill, with Rep. Clay Higgins as the sole House vote against it.
Senate agrees bill to release Epstein files after near-unanimous House vote
Read Article
Clay Higgins: The lone lawmaker to vote against releasing the Epstein files
Read Article
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like The Guardian frame the story positively, emphasizing bipartisan Senate agreement and House near-unanimity to highlight transparency progress. Center outlets like the BBC focus on Rep. Clay Higgins as the lone dissenter, underscoring broad consensus while spotlighting Republican opposition. Right-leaning perspectives are absent, potentially omitting defenses of Higgins or skepticism about the files’ implications for political figures.
2Trump: MBS knew nothing about Khashoggi murder
Story gist: President Donald Trump stated that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman knew nothing about the 2018 murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Trump defended the crown prince amid ongoing U.S.-Saudi relations.
Once a Pariah, Saudi Prince Resets U.S. Relations on His Own Terms
Read Article
‘Things happen’ – Trump defends Saudi crown prince over Khashoggi killing
Read Article
Trump: MBS knew nothing about Khashoggi murder
Read Article
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like The New York Times frame the story by emphasizing MBS’s rehabilitation from pariah status and his control over U.S. relations, highlighting Saudi influence. Center outlets like the BBC report neutrally, focusing on Trump’s defensive quote without added context. Right-leaning sources like The Telegraph directly quote Trump’s exoneration of MBS, omitting broader diplomatic implications to align with pro-Trump perspectives.
3‘I’m missing so much of my son’s life’: the families split by Labour’s asylum crackdown
Story gist: The UK Labour government’s asylum policy changes have separated families of asylum seekers. Parents report missing significant parts of their children’s lives due to these restrictions.
‘I’m missing so much of my son’s life’: the families split by Labour’s asylum crackdown
Read Article
How serious is Labour backlash over asylum plans?
Read Article
The Home Secretary’s immigration plan deserves her party’s support
Read Article
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like The Guardian frame the story with emotional personal anecdotes highlighting family separations caused by Labour’s crackdown, emphasizing human suffering. Center sources such as the BBC adopt a neutral tone, questioning the severity of political backlash without strong opinions. Right-leaning publications like The Telegraph support the policy, urging party backing and omitting family impacts to focus on immigration control benefits.
4UK net migration 20% lower in 2024 than first thought, ONS says
Story gist: The Office for National Statistics reported that UK net migration in 2024 was 20% lower than initially estimated. The data revealed a high number of Britons leaving the country.
Warning over ‘dangerous brain drain’ as number of Britons leaving UK revealed
Read Article
UK net migration 20% lower in 2024 than first thought, ONS says
Read Article
Britons flee country in record numbers ahead of Reeves tax raids
Read Article
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like The Independent frame the story with alarm, emphasizing a ‘dangerous brain drain’ from Britons leaving, highlighting potential economic harm. Center outlets like the BBC remain neutral, focusing solely on the ONS data showing lower net migration without interpretation. Right-leaning sources like The Telegraph portray it as a ‘fleeing’ exodus tied to impending tax increases under Reeves, critiquing government policy and implying economic push factors.