1광주-전남이 불붙인 지역통합… 부산-경남 “주민투표로 통합 속도”
Story gist: Gwangju and South Jeolla Province initiated regional administrative integration efforts. Busan and South Gyeongsang Province announced plans to pursue integration by 2028 through a resident vote and continue discussions with Ulsan.
부산·경남 2028년 행정통합 추진하기로··· “울산과도 논의 이어가기로”
Read Article
[김두수 칼럼]“부울경 주민 공감대 형성 최우선”
Read Article
광주-전남이 불붙인 지역통합… 부산-경남 “주민투표로 통합 속도”
Read Article
Bias summary: Left-leaning Kyeonghyang frames Busan-Gyeongnam’s announcement as proactive 2028 integration push, highlighting Ulsan talks. Center Daum column emphasizes prioritizing resident consensus in Buulgyeong. Right-leaning Dong-A uses dramatic tone, portraying it as Busan-Gyeongnam accelerating in response to Gwangju-Jeonnam’s ‘ignition,’ stressing resident vote without mentioning Ulsan.
2‘김건희 실형’ 우인성 재판장은 ‘형사 전문가’… 샤넬백·1억원 실물 검증도
Story gist: Judge Woo In-seong sentenced Kim Keon-hee to one year and eight months in prison for receiving gifts from the Unification Church. The trial included physical verification of a Chanel bag and 100 million won.
법원, 통일교 금품수수 김건희 1년 8개월 선고 [영상]
Read Article
김건희 선고에 시민들 허탈·분통‥”‘술 마셨지만 음주운전 아니다’는 궤변”
Read Article
‘김건희 실형’ 우인성 재판장은 ‘형사 전문가’… 샤넬백·1억원 실물 검증도
Read Article
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like kyeonggi.com emphasize the court’s sentencing of Kim Keon-hee to 1 year 8 months for Unification Church gifts. Center outlets like daum.net focus on citizens’ frustration and disappointment, quoting a ‘drunk driving sophistry’ analogy for her defense. Right-leaning Chosun Ilbo portrays Judge Woo as a criminal law expert who verified physical evidence like the Chanel bag and 100 million won.
3張 “징계, 절차대로 진행”… 韓 “닭 목 비틀어도 새벽 온다”
Story gist: Jang Dong-hyuk stated that disciplinary action against Han Dong-hoon is proceeding according to procedure. Han Dong-hoon responded with the proverb ‘Even if you twist the chicken’s neck, dawn comes.’ Lee Jun-seok criticized Han for equating himself with former President Kim Young-sam.
이준석 “한동훈, YS를 본인과 동치‥예의 아냐”
Read Article
장동혁 “韓 징계, 절차 따라 진행” 한동훈 “닭의 목 비틀어도 새벽 온다”
Read Article
張 “징계, 절차대로 진행”… 韓 “닭 목 비틀어도 새벽 온다”
Read Article
Bias summary: Left-leaning MBC emphasizes Lee Jun-seok’s criticism of Han Dong-hoon as impolite and self-equating to YS, framing Han negatively. Center Daum neutrally quotes both Jang’s procedural assurance and Han’s proverb without emphasis. Right-leaning Chosun Ilbo leads with Jang’s procedure statement and Han’s defiant proverb, highlighting inevitability and resilience, omitting criticism.
4민주당 “가짜 뉴스로 故 이해찬 전 총리 명예 훼손한 유튜버 법적책임 물어야”
Story gist: Former South Korean Prime Minister Lee Hae-chan died. The Democratic Party called for a YouTuber to face legal responsibility for defaming him with fake news.
민주당 “가짜 뉴스로 故 이해찬 전 총리 명예 훼손한 유튜버 법적책임 물어야”
Read Article
[뉴스초점] 이해찬 전 총리 별세…이 대통령, 이혜훈 지명철회
Read Article
[현장] “민주주의의 어르신이 떠났다”…이해찬 빈소에 이어진 조문 행렬
Read Article
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets (MBC) highlight Democratic Party demands for legal action against a YouTuber, framing it as defending Lee’s honor from fake news. Center outlets (Daum) neutrally cover Lee’s death alongside President Lee’s withdrawal of Lee Hye-hoon’s nomination. Right-leaning outlets (Chosun) emphasize respectful condolence visits and quote admirers calling Lee the ‘elder of democracy,’ omitting defamation controversy.
5이 대통령 “담배처럼 설탕 부담금 매겨 지역·공공 의료 투자 어떤가”…도입 논쟁 다시 불붙나
Story gist: South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung proposed imposing a sugar tax similar to tobacco taxes to fund regional and public healthcare investments. The suggestion has reignited debate over its potential introduction.
국민 건강 명분 ‘설탕세’ 꺼낸 이 대통령…물가 상승·역진성은 부담
Read Article
이 대통령 “설탕에도 담배처럼 세금 어때요?”…또 X에 올리자 답글 우르르 [지금뉴스]
Read Article
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning Hankyoreh frames the proposal skeptically as using ‘national health’ pretext while emphasizing burdens like price rises and regressivity. Center KBS neutrally reports the quote, social media post, and influx of replies. Right-leaning coverage absent, omitting conservative viewpoints on taxation or policy.