1Judge Orders Trump Administration to Fully Fund Food Stamps This Month
Story gist: A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to fully fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program this month. The ruling requires full funding of SNAP benefits by Friday.
Judge Orders Trump Administration to Fully Fund Food Stamps This Month
Read Article
Snap food benefits – Trump must fully fund aid program by Friday
Read Article
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like The New York Times frame the story by directly naming the Trump administration as the target of the judge’s order, emphasizing executive obligation. Center outlets like the BBC use neutral terms, focusing on the SNAP program and deadline without partisan emphasis. Right-leaning coverage is absent, indicating potential omission of stories highlighting judicial checks on conservative policies.
2Trump unveils deal to expand coverage and lower costs on obesity drugs Wegovy and Zepbound
Story gist: President Trump announced a deal to expand Medicare coverage for obesity drugs Wegovy and Zepbound. The agreement lowers costs to as little as $149 for certain patients.
Certain obesity drugs will cost as little as $149 and Medicare will start covering them under White House deals
Read Article
Trump unveils deal to expand coverage and lower costs on obesity drugs Wegovy and Zepbound
Read Article
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning CNN emphasizes affordability with $149 pricing and Medicare expansion under White House deals, using a positive tone focused on access benefits. Center AP News provides a neutral summary mirroring the announcement’s details without added emphasis. Right-leaning coverage is absent, leaving out potential conservative perspectives on government intervention or fiscal impacts.
3After California’s vote to counter Trump, here’s where redistricting stands
Story gist: California approved new congressional district maps following a vote aimed at countering Trump-era policies. Republicans filed a lawsuit to block the maps. Governor Gavin Newsom confirmed interest in a potential White House run amid the redistricting developments.
Republicans Swiftly File Lawsuit in Bid to Block California’s New House Maps
Read Article
After confirming possible White House run, California’s Newsom scores a win in fight for US House
Read Article
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like The New York Times emphasize Republicans’ swift lawsuit as an obstructive bid against California’s maps, highlighting Democratic resistance. Center outlets like AP News frame it as Newsom’s win in the House fight, tying it to his presidential ambitions with neutral progress reporting. Right-leaning coverage is absent, omitting perspectives that might portray the redistricting as partisan Democratic maneuvering or electoral overreach.
4Senate will vote Friday to advance shutdown-ending deal, Thune tells Republicans
Story gist: Senate Majority Whip John Thune informed Republicans that the Senate will vote on Friday to advance a deal ending the government shutdown.
Just When It Looked Like the Shutdown Might End
Read Article
Senate will vote Friday to advance shutdown-ending deal, Thune tells Republicans
Read Article
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like The Atlantic frame the story with skepticism, using a headline implying potential complications just as resolution seems near, emphasizing uncertainty. Center outlets like Politico provide neutral, factual reporting mirroring the event’s details without added tone. Right-leaning coverage is absent, indicating no prominent framing from that perspective, possibly due to differing priorities or lack of engagement with the shutdown narrative.
5Two ways countries could respond to the Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s tariffs
Story gist: The U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling on tariffs proposed by former President Donald Trump. Countries could respond to the decision through two potential strategies.
Trump Team Now Claims Its Trillions in Tariff Revenue Are ‘Incidental’
Read Article
Two ways countries could respond to the Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s tariffs
Read Article
No major right-leaning outlet from our monitored sources covered this story
Bias summary: Left-leaning outlets like The New York Times frame the story with skepticism, emphasizing the Trump team’s shift in claiming trillions in tariff revenue as ‘incidental,’ suggesting inconsistency. Center outlets like Axios provide neutral analysis, focusing on factual responses countries might take without judgment. Right-leaning coverage is absent, potentially indicating omission of perspectives that might defend Trump’s tariff policies or downplay criticisms.